<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://ruby.sys-con.com"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Ruby-on-Rails Viewpoint</title>
 <link>http://ruby.sys-con.com/</link>
 <description>Latest articles from Ruby-on-Rails Viewpoint</description>
 <language>en</language>
 <copyright>Copyright 2009 Ulitzer.com</copyright>
 <generator>Ulitzer.com</generator>
 <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:25:17 EST</lastBuildDate>
 <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
 <ttl>10</ttl>
<item>
 <title>Is Microsoft as Free as Open Source?</title>
 <link>http://ruby.sys-con.com/node/1103453</link>
 <description>Jon has a point; Microsoft’s restricted (i.e., Express) editions are as free as the open source alternatives. This is undeniably true, since the purpose of many software vendor’s “Express” edition is to compete against open source on price. However, the difference is that with open source you get the full-powered editions. For example, Linux (e.g., CentOs), Xen (for virtualization), PostgreSQL/MySQL, Apache, Java, Tomcat, AspectJ, Lucene, Hibernate, and Eclipse are all robust, full-featured, and powerful technologies available for free to developers. The variety and the quality of product available from the open source community are just astonishing. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ruby.sys-con.com/node/1103453&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://ruby.sys-con.com/node/1103453</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
