| By Web 2.0 News Desk | Article Rating: |
|
| January 25, 2008 01:00 PM EST | Reads: |
14,915 |
The New York Post has done it again. Its report on Thursday that Microsoft is once more contemplating a potential acquisition of Yahoo! has set the industry on fire with rumors, views, and counterviews. Here we bring you a round-up of what's being said and written...
Let's start with the Post itself. Back in May of 2007, reporters Peter Lauria and Zachary Kuowe reported that "Microsoft has intensified its pursuit of a deal with Yahoo!, asking the company to re-enter formal negotiations."
Estimating the price tag of such an acquisition at about $50BN, the Post's analysis was as follows:
"As it stands now, a deal between Microsoft and Yahoo! would up the combined companies' share of the all-important search advertising market to 27 percent against Google's 65 percent. It would also narrow the gap in overall online ads with Google to just 13 percent."But Lauria and Zachary also pinpointed a bigger picture:
Om Malik wrote about the original report that a Microsoft-Yahoo! merger would be "a bad idea":"More importantly, a deal would create what one source described as "the dominant force on the Internet" in terms of eyeballs. That's an important consideration as more and more content flows online - as the equations goes, eyeballs equal advertising.
Microsoft and Yahoo! also feature complimentary offerings on the content side, with MSN drawing an older audience with its news focus. By contrast, Yahoo! attracts a younger demographic with its entertainment coverage.
Aside from cost savings, a deal would also create opportunities to use Yahoo! content on Microsoft devices, such as making music exclusively provided to Yahoo! Music available on Microsoft's Xbox game console and Zune music player."
Seven months on, it seems the New York Post has resumed the hunt for details of what might be afoot between the two giants. In an article (again by Peter Lauria) reporting on how Microsoft's "deal king," VP of corporate development Bruce Jaffe, was going to be leaving the company, the Post noted, tantalizingly:
Published January 25, 2008 Reads 14,915
Copyright © 2008 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Web 2.0 News Desk
The Web 2.0 Journal News Desk keeps you up to speed with all that's happening in the world of the read/write Web and all its mushrooming new facets - from tagging, wikis, mash-ups, and image-sharing to "Advertising 2.0," podcasting, and The Writeable Web.
![]() |
an0n 01/12/08 12:33:00 PM EST | |||
Why does Yahoo! need Microsoft? Microsoft has largely stumbled in its internet ventures, while Yahoo! has been fairly successful. I don't see what Microsoft brings to the table in this. |
||||
![]() |
Yahoo! vs Google 01/12/08 12:31:21 PM EST | |||
Yahoo! used Google results for its searches between October 2002 & Feb 2004. They have used their own search engine (acquired with their purchase of Inktomi in 2003) ever since. |
||||
- 4th International Cloud Computing Conference & Expo Starts Today
- Is Microsoft as Free as Open Source?
- Deploying Azure Hosted Services Should Be as Easy as Deploying a Heroku Application
- Rhomobile CEO to Speak at iPhone Developer Summit 2009 West
- Aspect-Oriented Programming and You
- Rhomobile to Exhibit at Cloud Computing Conference & Expo
- Amazon's Virtual Private Cloud Service Goes Live
- Cloud Standards Sought ASAP
- Accelerating Innovation with Yahoo! Cloud Serving
- Enterprise LAMP Summit Asks Global Open Source Leaders “Can LAMP Deliver?”
- Java Kicks Ruby on Rails in the Butt
- 4th International Cloud Computing Conference & Expo Starts Today
- Ruby-on-Rails Apps Get Cloud Lift
- Open Source Selenium Web Application Testing System
- Rackspace Cloud APIs Open Sourced
- Yahoo & Microsoft Reportedly Close to Now-or-Never Deal
- What Could You Do with Your Code in 20 Lines or Less?
- Walter Cronkite's IT Career Advice
- Is Microsoft as Free as Open Source?
- Do You Trust Google More Than You Trust Your Wife?
- Why Do 'Cool Kids' Choose Ruby or PHP to Build Websites Instead of Java?
- Ruby on Rails Won't Make It in 2007 and Forget About AJAX
- The Jury's Still Out On Ruby On Rails (RoR) and AJAX
- Red Hat Named "Platinum Sponsor" of Virtualization Conference & Expo
- Can Ruby Live Without Rails?
- An Introduction to Ant
- Testing in Ruby on Rails
- Ruby On Rails Moves At 'Acela' Rates Toward Java
- Java Kicks Ruby on Rails in the Butt
- Cyberhive Supports Ruby On Rails





































