| By Doug Edwards | Article Rating: |
|
| August 20, 2008 11:45 AM EDT | Reads: |
5,185 |
Searching for the right word?
Please use Google to find it, but not to describe what you did.
With constant generic use, trademarks can lose their special status and their proper name capitalization. It’s happened to once-trademarked products including yo-yo, trampoline, and nylon. Trademark lawyers call it “genericide.” We call it avoidable.
Google™ is a trademark identifying Google Inc.’s search technology and services. We know Google is fun to say, and of course it’s great fun to use. And though we’re flattered that people like our name, it’s also our company’s chief commercial asset. We want to ensure that people use it in a way that preserves its meaning and integrity.
Google should never be used as a noun or a verb, or to mean “searching” in a non-specific, general sense. Here are some examples of appropriate and inappropriate uses of Google's trademark:
Appropriate
I used Google to check out that guy I met at the party.
Inappropriate
I googled that hottie.
Appropriate
We were looking for new MP3s with Google.
Inappropriate
We were googling ‘MP3s.’
Appropriate
He ego-surfs on Google to see if he's listed in the results.
Inappropriate
He googles himself..
Appropriate
They use Google to research the latest on lemurs.
Inappropriate
They google ‘lemurs.’
The distinction may be subtle, but it's a very important one to make. The choice of the right word often is. We're happy to answer any questions you may have about the proper use of the Google name. Write to us at legal@google.com.
We'll help you find just the words your searching for.
The ad was intentionally tongue-in- cheek and, at least in my mind, a tacit admission that it's much more fun to use Google as a verb than to use it properly. I mean, who wouldn't rather say, "I googled that hottie" than the legally-mandated, but dull-as-an-old-brogan alternative?
Though our efforts were occasionally disparaged by those who would prefer Google retain it’s warm fuzzy “just regular folks, no lawyers here” persona, the definitions of Google just published both properly cite the connection of “googling” to the Google search engine. I’m not an attorney, but as a brand manager, I wouldn’t be too upset about having authoritative printed support for the notion that Googling is correctly used only when tied directly to the company’s trademarked service.
Want to learn more about trademark protection? It's okay. Go ahead. Google it.
[This post appeared originally here on July 10, 2006 and is republished here in full by kind permission of the author, who retains full copyright.]
Published August 20, 2008 Reads 5,185
Copyright © 2008 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
- i-Technology Viewpoint: Google's GWT "May Change Web Development Forever"
- Working at Google vs. Working at Microsoft
- Web 2.0 Journal Feature: Google Plays API Catch-Up with Amazon
- RIA Conference Keynotes: Adobe & Microsoft
- GoGrid uses Google Web Toolkit to Extend Cloud Computing User Interface
- Cloud Computing Expo - Schmidt Speaks
More Stories By Doug Edwards
From 1999 to 2005, Doug Edwards was was director of consumer marketing and brand management for Google. Other work experience includes stints as online brand group manager for the San Jose Mercury News, communications director for KQED FM, admission officer for Brown University and Novosibirsk correspondent for the public radio program Marketplace. He blogs at http://xooglers.com, a gathering spot for ex-Googlers to reminisce and comment on the latest developments in search.
- 4th International Cloud Computing Conference & Expo Starts Today
- Adobe Flex Developer Earns $100K in New York City
- Rhomobile CEO to Speak at iPhone Developer Summit 2009 West
- Rhomobile to Exhibit at Cloud Computing Conference & Expo
- Building a Social Site with Ruby and Rails
- Accelerating Innovation with Yahoo! Cloud Serving
- JetBrains' IntelliJ IDEA Goes Open Source
- Migrating from UNIX / RISC to Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- What Could You Do With Your Code in 20 Lines or Less?
- JetBrains Releases RubyMine 2.0
- Elance Work Index Reveals Strong Demand for Qualified PHP Programmers
- Get Time Tracker Source Code in SproutCore
- 4th International Cloud Computing Conference & Expo Starts Today
- Is Microsoft as Free as Open Source?
- Adobe Flex Developer Earns $100K in New York City
- Rhomobile CEO to Speak at iPhone Developer Summit 2009 West
- Rhomobile to Exhibit at Cloud Computing Conference & Expo
- Building a Social Site with Ruby and Rails
- Accelerating Innovation with Yahoo! Cloud Serving
- Enterprise LAMP Summit Asks Global Open Source Leaders “Can LAMP Deliver?”
- Engine Yard Gets More Money
- JetBrains' IntelliJ IDEA Goes Open Source
- Migrating from UNIX / RISC to Red Hat Enterprise Linux
- What Could You Do With Your Code in 20 Lines or Less?
- Why Do 'Cool Kids' Choose Ruby or PHP to Build Websites Instead of Java?
- Ruby on Rails Won't Make It in 2007 and Forget About AJAX
- The Top 250 Players in the Cloud Computing Ecosystem
- The Jury's Still Out On Ruby On Rails (RoR) and AJAX
- Red Hat Named "Platinum Sponsor" of Virtualization Conference & Expo
- Can Ruby Live Without Rails?
- An Introduction to Ant
- Testing in Ruby on Rails
- Ruby On Rails Moves At 'Acela' Rates Toward Java
- Java Kicks Ruby on Rails in the Butt
- Cyberhive Supports Ruby On Rails
- Ruby on Rails One-Day Seminar: Introducing Ruby on Rails – the Pain-Killer for Web Developers
































