<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>From the Editor</title>
<link>http://ruby.sys-con.com/</link>
<description>Latest articles from From the Editor</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 RUBY-ON-RAILS</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:01:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>RUBY-ON-RAILS</generator>
<ttl>10</ttl>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>

<item>
<title>Red Hat Pits Itself Against VMware</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ruby.sys-con.com/read/458552.htm</guid><link>http://ruby.sys-con.com/read/458552.htm</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Watching VMware stock and its market cap spike since it IPO&apos;d must have had Red Hat positively pea green with envyWatching VMware stock and its market cap spike since it IPO&apos;d must have had Red Hat positively pea green with envy - so green in fact that it&apos;s gonna try taking VMware on by pushing the Xen virtualization integrated in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). Red Hat&apos;s new goal is to underpin 50% of the world&apos;s servers by 2015.    And since virtualization is projected to take over the world by then that&apos;s a lot of Xen virtualization - and there&apos;s no extra cost in it like there is with VMware since it&apos;s bundled with RHEL. (Red Hat&apos;s telling people they&apos;ll save $20,000-$30,000 a server.) Red Hat claims it&apos;s got its first 18,000 virtualized servers - although it&apos;s a little fuzzy about whether those 18,000 are actually in production - anyway, it&apos;s confident they&apos;ll get there eventually after all the testing and evaluating is done.</description>

</item></channel></rss>